Facibus Reviews

Greg Knauss discusses Richard Dawkins’ views on two opposing worldviews or magisteriums - that of science and that of religion. Basically, Dawkins holds that nothing lies outside the realm of science - that the nature of Deity and faith can be discussed scientifically.

Dawkins mentions a third Magisterium - that of the Stupid. Knauss claims it as his own:

Just because something is stupid, doesn’t mean that it can’t make lots and lots of money. Just as scientists claim dominion over their magisteria, and theologians claim dominion over theirs, a huge and empty space is left for the stupid questions. Who claims dominion over them?

Starting now, I do. I declare myself the world’s primary expert in questions so stupid that they lack any sort of meaning other than reasonably correct grammar.

I hereby also demand co-equal attention with the other magisteria. If there’s a debate to be had about evolution and both science and religion are represented, then so should stupid questions, in the person of me. If government money is to be divided between science and religious (“faith-based�) functions, then meaningless twaddle should get a share of the loot. And any news story from a supposedly objective source must now include the perspective of the ridiculously idiotic to be considered impartial. I’m available for quotes and press-shoots by request.

Good on him! Someone needs to be able to explain the following:

• Happy Meals,
• The Spice Girls,
• people who grow obese watching sport on TV,
• the popularity of MySpace,
• Chardonnay,
• the continuing existence of mainstream advertising,
• Australian Idol,  and
• Chihuahuas.

Is there anything I’ve missed?