<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2.3" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Health implications of using portable eBook readers</title>
	<link>http://facibusreviews.com/blog/2007/04/16/health-implications-of-using-portable-ebook-readers/</link>
	<description>Andrew Boyd reviews life, design, and Shiraz</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 14:16:15 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2.3</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: Webscab debate - ebook vs paper book wars continue at Facibus Reviews</title>
		<link>http://facibusreviews.com/blog/2007/04/16/health-implications-of-using-portable-ebook-readers/#comment-50</link>
		<dc:creator>Webscab debate - ebook vs paper book wars continue at Facibus Reviews</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2007 01:00:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://facibusreviews.com/blog/2007/04/16/health-implications-of-using-portable-ebook-readers/#comment-50</guid>
		<description>[...] with a lot of diagrams and illustrated novels are still better in hard copy form. We know that ebook readers can be as eye-friendly as paper. As soon as there is a commonly available readily-usable solution for illustrations, paper books [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] with a lot of diagrams and illustrated novels are still better in hard copy form. We know that ebook readers can be as eye-friendly as paper. As soon as there is a commonly available readily-usable solution for illustrations, paper books [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
